Subject: Seasons Greetings from the Anthropogenic Climate Change
Sceptics (Militant Wing)
‘The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits’ – Albert Einstein
EXTREME WEATHER REPORT 2012
Extreme weather events are ever present, and there is no evidence of systematic increases
JoNova: Science, carbon, climate and tax
Jim Hawes B.Sc. M.Ed. Dip. Ed. Grad. Cert. Chem. Grad. Cert. Phys., retired science teacher, provides rational views and advice, with some humour….
From:Geoff Derrick [firstname.lastname@example.org
Sent: Friday, 23 November 2012 12:57 AM
Subject: RE: Passionate geology
I have just endured the major entry of Tony Jones into the world of science fiction, as he tonight presented a lengthy Lateline report on geoengineering, ranging from ocean fertilisation by iron to aluminium and sulphate particles etc n the sky, to creation of man-made volcanoes, all to stop emissions of plant food. These are dangerous stupid people (hence the presence of Clive Hamilton), and two angles in reply come to mind in any forthcoming letter one is a quote by Einstein that the difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits. The other angle is one I made up myself just now, and with a wink to Mrs Malaprop, I suspect that all geo engineers are just a bunch of aerosols.
From: Carter, Bob [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:10 PM
To: Geoff Derrick; ‘Kim Stanton-Cook’; John Nethery; Ian Plimer; ‘Viv Forbes’
Subject: RE: Passionate geology
Go, Roger, go, and I am sure that we all understand
the reasons for your impatience.
The scientific arguments that are supposed to support DAGW have been in tatters for years, yet the political bandwagon simply rolls on as if all was well with the IPCCs insane policy advice.
Most remarkable of all, though, is that no group of sensible
business people has emerged on the global scene (even if behind the scenes) to organize persons like Lindzen, Plimer, Kininmonth et al. into a properly funded organisation to fight these noxious policies at a fully professional level. Yes, much money would be needed to market the necessary messages, but unless you base that expenditure on expert and truly independent scientific advice it will be largely wasted.
What we are seeing in the West is nothing less than the destruction of our historically hard-won rationalist polity by emotional environmental terrorism from within. The response of leading business people, world wide, seems to be to shrug and say (i) what does our company need to do to conform to green political correctness, so that we are not demonized in the media and threatened by the likes of Greenpeace; and (ii) that taken care of, how do we make a buck out of this? Richard Branson might be cited as the holotype for this type of behaviour.
It is hard to believe that so many so well educated and/or wealthy people can be so very stupid, and their children and ours are in due course going to pay the price.
Professor Robert (Bob) M. Carter
Marine Geophysical Laboratory
James Cook University
Townsville, Qld. 4811
Phone (evening): +61-(0)7-4775-1268 Web home page: http://members.iinet.net.au/~glrmc/ ——————————————————————–
Phone (evening): +61-(0)7-4775-1268
Web home page: http://members.iinet.net.au/~glrmc/
Roger Dewhurst had a rant on WUWT today, re the Gergis/Mann debacle;& his passionate words are not a bad advertisement for making Earth Science the subject de jour in our universities.& Without a geological understanding, we are but empty vessels.
1.Roger Dewhurst says:
Climate shroundwavers and sceptics alike, are engaged in a totally futile argument over questionable data, questionable models and questionable interpretation all revolving around data collected over a mere 1/ 10^8 of the history of this planet, and influenced by short term political perspective. For god’s sake consider how this planet formed 4,500 million years ago, how the crust and mantle differentiated from the metallic core, how primitive forms of life permitted the formation of an atmosphere containing oxygen, how volcanoes in the process of a differentiating crust fed the atmosphere with carbon dioxide, how after plants populated this planet the carbon in carbon dioxide was deposited in vast deposits of coal, limestone, chalk, oil and gas. From the beginning volcanic activity has contributed carbon dioxide to the atmosphere at a gradually decreasing rate. The rate has changed at times because volcanic activity has waxed and waned. The vast forests of carboniferous times soaked up the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and plants have continued to remove it from the atmosphere since then. The carbon from the atmosphere has been converted, by plants, to peat and coal on land and to limestone, chalk, oil and gas in the oceans and oceanic sediments. That process continues today. The tenor of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has, irregularly, declined to the point where it is now sub-optimal for the growth of most plants. This has happened because, on average, the rate of deposition of carbon in soils and marine sediments has overtaken the rate of emission of carbon dioxide
from volcanic sources both on land and in the oceans. Many things have influenced climate throughout the history of this planet, among them are the output of the sun, the orbit of this planet around the sun, the positions of the land masses on the surface of the planet which determine the location and strength of the oceanic currents which transfer heat from equatorial to polar regions, and changes and reversals of the earths magnetic field. Of all these matters we have much less than total understanding and over none of them do we have any control whatsoever. Nevertheless we are beset with idiots knowing next to nothing, obsessed with the number of angels able to dance on the head of a pin and insisting that we, puny creatures that we are, are about to destroy the planet by burning a trivial proportion of the coal, oil and gas reserves stored in the earth’s crust, thus returning to the atmosphere that which came from it.
Chelmer Office Services
10 Central Avenue Graceville Q 4075
Bob Carter’s New Book
Climate: the Counter Consensus
From:Geoff Derrick [firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Monday, 19 November 2012 12:10 PM
To: Kim Stanton-Cook
Subject: RE: Unsual for their ABC to be running this…..
Al Gore works in a similar mindset to Flannery see his learned science re Earth’s temperature.
CONAN O’BRIEN, HOST: Now, what about … you talk in the book about geothermal energy…
AL GORE, NOBEL LAUREATE: Yeah, yeah.
O’BRIEN: …and that is, as I understand it, using the heat that’s generated from the core of the earth ..
O’BRIEN: …to create energy, and it sounds to me like an evil plan by Lex Luthor to defeat Superman. Can you, can you tell me, is this a viable solution, geothermal energy?
GORE: It definitely is, and it’s a relatively new one. People think about geothermal energy – when they think about it at all – in terms of the hot water bubbling up in some places, but two kilometers or so down in most places there are these incredibly hot rocks, ’cause the interior of the earth is extremely hot, several million degrees, and the crust of the earth is hot …
On Tuesday, National Review’s John Derbyshire noted:
The geothermal gradient is usually quoted as 25-50 degrees Celsius per mile of depth in normal terrain (not, e.g., in the crater of Kilauea). Two kilometers down, therefore, (that’s a mile and a quarter if you’re not as science-y as Al)you’ll have an average gain of 30-60 degrees – exploitable for things like home heating, though not hot enough to make a nice pot of tea. The temperature at the earth’s core, 4,000 miles down, is usually quoted as 5,000 degrees Celsius, though these guys claim it’s much less, while some contrarian geophysicists have posted claims up to 9,000 degrees. The temperature at the surface of the Sun is around 6,000 degrees Celsius, while at the center, where nuclear fusion is going on bigtime, things get up over 10 million degrees.
Chelmer Office Services
10 Central Avenue Graceville Q 4075
Ph: 3379 2555
Fax: 33792 375
From: Kim Stanton-Cook [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Monday, 19 November 2012 9:00 AM
To: roger hobbs; George Lloyd; Geoff Derrick; Martin Booker; paul melville; Paul Burrell Subject: Unsual for their ABC to be running this…..
And, for good measure, today I heard Tim Flannery, a man for whom hyperbole is an artform, say that 70 million native animals are killed each day by cats, presumably feral and domestic…
Hi Kim and Viv
Three in three days quite an overload, and so far none published. My chest is lighter however.
Letter to Editor, The Australian, sent Sunday 9 Jan 2011.
Mr Steketee (Weekend Australian 8 Jan 2011) needs to tread carefully in the highly manipulated world of climate and weather statistics. Quoting data from the UN World Meteorological Organisation is suspect because the WMO jointly created the IPCC, which is dedicated to proving that anthropogenic warming is happening regardless of evidence. The British Met Office is in disarray for its conflicting and error-prone forecasts provided to the UK, while in New Zealand the national weather body abandoned their official temperature records because of manipulation of past data by the government agency. In Australia, the BOM is no different to many other data collection agencies around the world in selective manipulation of older raw data records downwards (i.e. cooler), thus making the overall trend appear warmer to the present. This effect is also achieved by closing of thousands of data stations around the world, most in the cooler regions, thus leading to a warming bias. Recent high-quality ice core data from Greenland shows that of the past 10,500 years, 9,100 were warmer than 2010, with no relation to CO2, while the longest instrumental record in the world in central England shows that December 2010 was the second coldest December dating back to 1659. Australian raw data shows that we have warmed only 0.6oC since 1910, and Mr Steketee needs to look at the less alarmist bigger picture and to be better informed about the work of experts such as Professor Bob Carter.
G M Derrick
The Australian: Letter to the Editor
8 January 2011
Andy Pitman (Australian 7 January 2011) is just another climate alarmist who now wants to bet each way – all cooling and all warming are now a product solely of mans contributions of CO2 to the atmosphere. The evidence for this is slight to non-existent, and Pitman appeals to authority by wanting to give the planet the benefit of the doubt. Pitman is a climate modeller whose models have about as much scientific credibility as the recent foray by Tim Flannery into the world of Gaia his predicted tropospheric hotspot has simply failed to materialize. Recent observational science of Greenland ice cores, as distinct from modelling, shows that of the past 10,500 years, 9,100 were warmer than 2010. Some 2010 peer reviewed papers so beloved by Pitman clearly show no direct correlation between anthropogenic CO2 and global warming, and to assume, like Pitman, that the science is settled is just another academic travesty.
G M Derrick
53 Lilly Street
Sherwood Q 4075
7 January 2011
Currently all levels of government and a generous population are planning to spend at least $6 billion and counting to repair and renew the flood damage to people, agriculture, mining and infrastructure which comprise the engine room of our economy. At the same time the Federal Government is planning to spend billions more dollars in the guise of a carbon tax, as part of a futile gesture to reduce emissions of a non-toxic and life-supporting gas by a few parts per million by 2050. Two things are clear: one, our agricultural industry wants more, not less of this harmless non-toxic gas because it makes plants grow and civilizations flourish, and two, the governments carbon tax will typically be another total waste of taxpayers money blown against the wall, squandered in the name of unproven and faltering science and a nonsensical Labor-Green idealogical purity.
G M Derrick
53 Lilly Street, Sherwood Q 4075
Sent: Thursday, 24 December 2009 12:43 PM
To: ‘Terrence Sweetman’
Subject: Seasons Greetings from the Anthropogenic Climate Change Sceptics (Militant Wing)
..or, what we Anthropogenic Climate Change Sceptics do to entertain ourselves when we’re not being scorned, vilified and condemned by journalists.
Now, for your holiday entertainment, try the following
(minor BBC4 promo in front, be patient, Clive’s discourse is very good)
The sad state of affairs re climate change:
What Happened to Global Warming?: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/saunders101309.php3
The impassioned finale to Lord Monckton’s appeal to the American people: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40
Climate Change So What? by Hans Schreuder: www.nothingtodowithco2.com/pdf/AGW_presentation_ILMCD.pdf
The Falsification of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within the Frame of Physics
Gerlich, G., Tscheuschner, R.D., Jan6, 2009: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.1161v4.pdf
Getting RICH on alarmism..
KS-C: I’ve reverted to the very simple and mundane when arguing with alarmists (although they’re becoming hard
to find in the circles I move in, or will be moving out of, like the GSA)
Global temperatures (air & ocean) have been measured mostly over the last 150 years with mercury thermometers with one degree graduations. We’re not talking precision here even before we get to the heat island effects.
Same degree of accuracy in measuring global sea levels also difficult to find, may need FOI
Earth’s life forms invariably exploit abundance and if there’s an abundance of, say, CO2, those organisms with the capacity to use it will prosper and grow.
CO2 has dropped out of the alarmists lexicon, replaced by the original greenhouse gases catch-all as they realised we were on to their unsustainable argument. Did I send you this simple but straight-forward explanation of CO2’s contribution Hawaii Reporter
I’m going to burn sulphides, generate power, make sulphuric acid for sale and for leaching our copper out of the roaster calcine. and claim carbon credits I love the irony!
GMD Letter to the Editor The Australian
Correspondent P Machanick (Letters, 20 October) states that mainstream science supporting anthropogenic global warming (AGW) has held up well against skeptical science. I beg to differ. There is more valuable science coming from the skeptics than from any Global Warming theory based on computer modeling. The IPCC has simply omitted data that was contrary to its predetermined outcomes, as shown by discredited hockey stick graphs and recent controversy over tree rings in Siberia and the Urals; the man-made hotspot predicted by the ICCP models has yet to materialize in our planet’s equatorial troposphere; there has been no ocean heat buildup for the last 50 years, icecaps are within normal ranges, and oceans are currently cooling slightly; rises in carbon dioxide are shown to follow, not cause, temperature increases evident in ice cores from the past 400,000 years, and sea levels are not rising abnormally. On the soon-to be drowned Maldives, described by some as the Island of Mad, there has been no sea level rise for 1200 years. When someone in the IPCC can actually prove anthropogenic CO2 emissions cause global warming and all the other predicted disasters, they may deserve the Nobel science prize.
Meanwhile, the AGW theory has been called Fraud with Lipstick. Based on emerging skeptical science, pursuit of AGW and an ETS by ill-informed governments will be one of the most costly scientific delusions of the past century.
G M Derrick
Thanks to Andrew Bolt:
..and from the indefatigable Viv Forbes.
CS 9 12 17 Dec 2009
Please Spread Carbon Sense Around. Talk to friends and neighbours. Keep sowing the seeds.
If images are lost or
format mangled in transmission, you can link to a print friendly PDF of this
Lessons from Europe.
Although Germany’s promotion of renewable energies is commonly portrayed in the media as setting a shining example in providing a harvest for the world(The Guardian 2007), we would instead regard the country’s experience as a cautionary tale of massively expensive environmental and energy policy that is devoid of economic and environmental benefits.
Full report see:
1.Green Energy some lessons from Europe
While the Rudd climate regiment is stuck in Copenhagen, achieving not much, they should look beyond their posh hotel for some lessons in energy generation.
First, slip over to France and note how these wily promoters of carbon rationing rely on nuclear power for 76% of their own energy.
Then visit UK and observe the frenzied construction of coal mines and nuclear power stations to prevent future blackouts caused by UK’s silly dalliance with costly and unreliable wind farms.
Don’t miss out on Spain where the cost of subsidising green energy has created a financial crisis and destroyed 2.2 real jobs for every green job created.
They could also visit Scandinavia, which relies heavily on hydro power, or Iceland, where geothermal power is easily harnessed. No wonder these countries are relaxed about imposing carbon Ration-N-Tax Schemes on the rest of us.
A quick trip to Moscow could reveal how the cunning Russians, despite their well known scepticism about the west’s thermo-mania, have managed to trick Europe into buying huge quantities of gas together with the millions of emissions permits needed to burn it. Boris loves the ETS.
Just next door in Germany, Minister Wong could find out how the Greens have left Germany dangerously reliant on Russian gas. The German gamble with alternate energy has produced little power and no environmental benefits at great cost.
Finally, without leaving Copenhagen, Mr Rudd could easily discover how the forests of Danish windmills have produced little useful power and large financial losses for the suffering Danes. Freezing Copenhagen is heated mainly by imported electricity.
The Chinese however are happy with Green Energy Europe they are busy manufacturing most of the world’s solar panels and wind turbines, emitting much carbon dioxide in the process.
This short European trip will illustrate the stupidity of Australia promoting a carbon Ration-N-Tax Scheme and dreaming that we can maintain our industry and our lifestyle on costly and totally unreliable alternate energy sources like wind and solar.
2.Nature Snows on the global warming circus in Copenhagen
The Gore Effect strikes again.
Hundreds of people demonstrated and complained outside the meeting hall in Copenhagen yesterday at having to wait for up to ELEVEN HOURS IN THE FREEZING COLD, to get into the meeting to complain about GLOBAL WARMING!
45,000 people were trying to get into a room with capacity of 15,000. Sounds like CRU at East Anglia did the counting.
Gutter Tactics from the IPCC Scare the Children.
Watch this unbelievable horror video shown at the opening for the Copenhagen Climate Change Circus:
This illustrates the lengths and depths to which the individuals behind this movement are prepared to descend.
4.One hundred reasons why global warming is natural
The Daily EXpress lists 100 reasons:
The tide has turned with the public, and the media has sensed it. But the thermo-maniacs will not give up easily. They are close to their fond goal of putting the western world in chains to fund the biggest redistribution of wealth the world has ever seen. The whole scam is about as honest as a porno magazine with a picture of mother Teresa on the cover.
5.Free Sex at Gropenhagen
Now we know why so many world leaders have decided to attend after all!
6. New Climate Consensus Global Warming is caused by rising US postal charges.
Here is a correlation better than the temperature vs carbon dioxide correlation supporting Al Gore’s Thermo-mania global warming is driven by US postal charges. See:
7. Twelve days at CarbonHagen
For those who missed it here is “The 12 Days of Global Warming at CarbonHagen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmPSUMBrJoI&feature=player_embedded
8. Thriving WITH Nature and Humanity
The genuine environment and conservation movement is one of the most important social movements on Earth. Yet, its credibility is endangered by confused and fearful politicians, alarmist activists, sensationalist media and prominent extremists with financial conflicts of interest.
Today we hear constant messages about the changing climate and the dire consequences that may have for our beautiful planet. Hearing loud, contradictory accusations and predictions of planetary doom you may feel confused about what and who to believe. Supposed experts disagree on both what is happening to our planet and the causes of what is happening. Yet we’re told there is universal agreement global warming was caused by humans
It’s clear our climate, including temperatures, continually varies. Examination of this ongoing variation becomes alarm when doom is predicted from the presence of humans on
Earth. Many people feel powerless and immobilised which only deepens their mix of confusion, desperation, apathy and panic
You may think global warming needs to be treated as seriously as pollution yet they’re actually different issues and we should be even more concerned about the core issue – climate alarm. That’s because throughout human history actions driven by fear produced solutions far worse than the initial perceived problem.
The above are extracts from a masterful paper by Malcolm Roberts. See the full paper by following:http://carbon-sense.com/2009/12/16/nature-and-humanity/
Finally, Is the Earth Warming or Cooling? It depends.
See Bob Carter on the GW hoax: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=FOLkze-9GcI&pop_ads=0
That’s all for now.
Carbon Sense is a newsletter produced by the Carbon Sense Coalition, an Australian based organisation which opposes waste of resources, opposes pollution, and promotes the rational and sustainable use of carbon energy and carbon food.
Please spread Carbon Sense around.
For more information visit our web
Literary, financial or other contributions to help our cause are welcomed.
Viv Forbes MS 23, Rosewood, Qld, 4340 Australia.
This compilation courtesy of
Golden Cross Resources
22 Edgeworth David Ave
HORNSBY NSW 2077
T: 02 9472 3500
F: 02 9482 8488
M: 0411 504 512
The Feedjit SMEDG Visitor Map Which one of the red squares is you?